One of the ultimate and pressing goals of our domestic enemies, liberals (democrats) is to disarm the American people.  As is virtually always the case, liberals create the problem, then the first thing they do is attack conservatism, attack our fundamental God-given rights, then demand more power and control over our lives.

Let’s look at some recent headlines of the liberals’ call for our disarmament.

“Obama Uses Facebook to Push Gun Control”

“Obama Criticizes Congress on Gun Control Failings”

“Obama Renews Gun Control Push”

Ok, enough about Obama, we all know he’s the NRA’s number one gun saleman.

Let’s look at Obama’s mini-me, Hillary Clinton

“Hillary Clinton Says Opponents of Gun control laws Terrorize Americans”

One is enough from this criminal who’s been running to stay one step ahead of the law for decades.

We’ll list one last headline, a real laugher,

“Top Constitutional Lawyers Explain What the Second Amendment Really Says About Gun Control”  (naturally that the 2^nd Amendment doesn’t say what it says)

For liberal lawyers and judges today to claim that the 2^nd Amendment was not intended to protect our rights (uninfringed) to own firearms is laughable for those of us who can read. The Supreme Court is mentioned in the U.S. Constitution and given the following jurisdiction: Section 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;

-to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;

-to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;

-to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;

-to Controversies between two or more States;

-between a State and Citizens of another State;

-between Citizens of different States;

-between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

Hmmmm, you scratch your head looking for the vast powers it exercises today. “So, this goof, left out that part”, you say to yourself. No, my friends, that’s all there is.  Our founders never intended for an oligarchy of moron judges to control our nation, especially our social policies.  Sadly, it jumped off the tracks quickly, as the court usurped its right of “judicial review” of federal law rather quickly, in 1794, then the most famous case of Marbury vs. Madison in 1803. Then they never stopped because no one stopped them, much to our everlasting regret today.

Thomas Jefferson observed in 1823, “At the establishment of our constitution, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.”

Interestingly it was only in modern times that the floodgate opened for the Supreme Court to rule on state law, with the 1954 Brown vs. board of education.  Only a couple and more minor trampling of states rights and law had occurred prior to that point.  Now, it seems so natural that we don’t even give it a second thought, but our “supreme court” today is nothing but an extra-constitutional totalitarian institution that controls so much of our lives.

As far as what the second amendment truly means, once again if you can read, its meaning is readily apparent.  Liberals belong to what they believe is an exclusive upper caste of intellectuals who we commoners must rely on.  Our founders wrote a very simple to understand founding document (ok, at the time, I realize late 18th century English can be a bit laborious).

What would liberals think of their beloved first Amendment if it read thusly: “Freedom of speech, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to speak freely shall not be infringed.”

Their only argument in the 2nd amendment as written is the militia means a state sanctioned military organization.  Did the authors of the amendment mean that?  Prior to the constitution and the addition of the bill of rights, the colonists viewed the God-given right of private gun ownership, among other reasons, as providing a “natural right of self defense”.

All of the early state constitutions had nearly identical wording as “the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state”.  When the bill of rights was ratified, that was the background and intent of our 2nd Amendment.

As Alexander Hamilton explained, “If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens.”

As Noah Webster observed, “Before a standing army can rule the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.  The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.”

As George Mason observed, “to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them …Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.”

James Monroe said is was a basic “human right” for the people to “keep and bear arms”.

Samuel Adams, “Be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms…”

I could go on forever. Only a complete liar claims contrary to what those who fashioned our country meant.  Not a single one of our founders envisioned the people being disarmed, they all held the European powers in derision for disarming their citizens.  So, I can take the word of our modern day scoundrels masquerading as constitutional scholars or I can side with those that actually wrote and ratified our constitution.

These modern day preening fools act as if only after consulting horse livers or digging up ancient runes from the desert can we understand our constitution.  And we wonder why our country is going to hell in a hand basket as liberals slowly squeeze the life out of us.

Revolution – a forcible overthrow of a government or social order in favor of a new system – conjures up images of a banana republic where the “strongman” overthrows the existing government at the end of a gun and institutes totalitarian control over the hapless nation.  Revolution in the United States brings to our remembrance our own “Revolutionary War” where we did, indeed forcibly overthrow the British government and instituted ultimately our constitutional republic that served our nation very well for nearly two centuries, with a hiccup or two along the way.

So, why do we need a revolution now?  Are we at the critical crossroad that a forcible overthrow of our government is required?  Aren’t we still the United States of America, still a constitutional republic?  Well, are we?  Is our government as currently constituted the government our founders envisioned and put in place?  Is our social order of the kind that served our nation very well for most of its history?  If your answer is NO to both of those questions, then what options do we have to return to what we once were?  We have only two choices, we can either change through the ballot box or through a forced change by unconventional political means.

There is a battle that has raged for some time in our nation, a battle that traditional Americans at first scoffed at, then gradually began to understand as all that made this nation great has been witnessed to have been stripped away, one plank at a time.

Pat Buchanan warned of the war that has been thrust upon us by those who want to transform America during his 1992 Republican National Convention speech when he said,

“Friends, this election is about more than who gets what.  It is about who we are.  It is about what we believe and what we stand for as Americans.  There is a religious war going on in this country.  It is a cultural war, as critical to the kind of nation we shall be as the Cold War itself.  For this is war is for the soul of America.”

As you may recall if you’re old enough, Mr. Buchanan was roundly scoffed at by democrats, their media and the republican establishment types.  They viewed as foolishness, Mr. Buchanan’s assertion that a “war” of this sort raged within our borders.  Now, nearly a quarter century later, recreational drug use is legal in two states, sodomy has been legalized and of course recently the “right” to marry has been granted to homosexuals by Supreme Court diktat, while Christianity, the founding ethos of our nation is increasingly being criminalized.

This and subsequent writings really aren’t intended to address silly liberal arguments intended to appeal to their cult followers.  This site is not a racist sight.  Great Americans of all races and persuasions do participate in what I call traditional America and are as offended as I am at what our nation is quickly becoming.  Yes, many of our founding fathers were slave owners.  Slavery was a very common practice in all corners of the world.  The serious minded knows that it was almost exclusively British and American Christians that led the battle against the scourge of slavery which finally ended it in the civilized west.

Yes, we concede that our United States Constitution allowed for slavery and yes, African slaves were only counted as 3/5ths of a person which liberals would deceptively claim meant that they were something less than human.  However, the serious and truthful mind knows that fraction was intended to limit the total population of the slave holding states and thus reduce their number of congressmen.  It was intended NOT to allow more political power to reside in the slave states unfairly, simply off the backs of their slaves.  Yes, we concede that the democrat party was the party of slavery and the lighter but still ugly subjugation of the African population following the Civil War for nearly a century until various infringements on their rights as citizens were finally abolished a half century ago.

The United States is not heaven, it has always been populated by fallible men, but men like the world has never known before in such a concentration in one place.  Men that had a vision to create something very unique, something very powerful as it unleased the unlimited potential of humanity in an environment of freedom and peace under the morally straight structure of Christianity.  For all of its real and imagined flaws, nothing has ever existed in the annals of history like the United States of America.  Liberals destroy it at their peril and the peril of the whole world itself.

It was Robert H. Jackson who said,

“whenever we reproach our own imperfections, as we ought often to do, we must not forget that our shortcomings are visible only when measured against our ideals, never when put beside the practical living conditions of the rest of the world. We have by Constitution, by legislation, and by judicial decision translated the Declaration out of the language of abstract philosophy into the idiom of everyday living. We have validated democratic principles by our success.”

Is there a need at this moment in time to radically alter the present course of our nation?  Those who have their eyes open, I believe, will say yes.  Following chapters will present the case that drastic measures are now needed before the grand experiment known as the United States of America comes to an end.  The clock is striking midnight and the bell has pealed out 11 tolls of the 12 already.