Blitzkrieg was the revolutionary military tactic that called for quick penetration of the enemy lines with armor and other motor vehicles with overwhelming air support to disrupt the enemy line, encircle and isolate pockets of enemy resistance and then destroy them. We know how well the concept worked as Germany conquered western Europe. Only the shear distances involved, over-confidence on Hitler’s part and likely divine intervention with a severe winter prevented the conquest of the Soviet Union.

Following WWII the Soviets embraced blitzkrieg in the military planning for taking western Europe if it came to it. Massive tank forces were to penetrate as far and as fast into Germany followed by mechanized infantry units to accomplish the same thing. Now, of course, it is the model for any advanced military.

Likewise, our liberals are using the exact same tactic in a political/cultural way. Push the envelope, advance far into a solid wall of American Traditionalism and break it apart. They have done this piecemeal with each area of “traditionalism”, yet there is unity of purpose, a desired end result and their tactics are winning, perhaps they have already won and we are merely the victims of the “infantry” mop-up operations.

Theological liberalism came first in the late 1800’s early 1900’s. By 1930 virtually every protestant denomination had either been conquered or seriously compromised. This led to political and cultural liberalism, the loss of absolutes, the rise of relativism, the embrace of godlessness and the era of big government to solve problems.

At the beginning of our downfall, the large picture may have been obscured. Many could not connect the dots as churches fell, a major political party turning leftward, entertainment and the arts becoming decadent and hedonistic. The amendments for taxation and the senators elected by popular vote under Wilson was the beginning. Liberal courts then began their remake of America beginning with FDR’s court, the expansion of the “commerce clause”, the Brown decision of 1954, removing God from the public square, abortion and on up to legalizing and promoting depravity with the perverts’ victories in the court in 2003 and 2015.

Toppling the education system to mold it to their will, to corrupt the young minds that had to pass through it was another master stroke, next to the corruption of the churches, the most important of all. All of our institutions that shape opinion, the churches, the arts and entertainment, the media and our schools once contributed to a common culture, Judeo-Christian. The enemy shattered their common base of how they portrayed America, individually conquering them and turning them against the nation as a whole.

Liberals behave now as if they’ve won because in many ways they have. We still put up stiff resistance. Our victories in retaking congress is proof of our viability, but the hour is late. Our congress, mostly staffed by weak ineffective leaders and members are clearly cowed by the enemy forces. Perhaps rightly so, if their only goal is to hold on to power. However, positions of power and the exercise of it are two different things. The fact that our leaders in congress cannot get in front of a camera and actually explain conservatism leads to only one of two possibilities, either they themselves don’t know what it is, or they are afraid to speak it.

Many people on our side hate Donald Trump, fearing he is nothing more than an opportunist, a charlatan, a New York moderate or even liberal tapping into anger to advance politically, conning tens of millions of concerned citizens. I fail to see the real proof that this is true. That he’s flawed, that he changed some positions over time is certainly true. He’s not my first choice, Cruz is, but I’ve resigned myself to the fact that Donald is going to be our standard bearer. I believe two things will motivate Trump, his own inner core and what the masses of patriotic Americans clamor for.

It has taken just about exactly a century for America to decline to the sad condition we witness today. I don’t expect our next president to bring in a new age of Aquarius in four years. It is not even necessary. All Trump has to do is stop the conquest by foreign invaders and appoint conservative judges. The former gives the democrat party its power and the latter advances the democrat agenda by judicial diktat.

I commented last week that Trump should announce his cabinet this summer, allow these men and women to have skin in the game and blanket the country be spokesmen for the cabinet. Show people who they are voting for. It was interesting that Hannity on the radio a couple days ago said the same thing. Was Trump’s statement last night about Ben Carson and education a preview of this?

The plain truth is that our nation’s main problem is not a political problem, that is merely a symptom. At the root of all of our problems is a spiritual problem and from that flows the immorality, the materialism, the relativism the decadence, the embrace of foolish politicians, that stains our nation. The oft quoted statement by Alexis De Tocqueville is still operative, “America is great because America is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great”. This is where we are at today, his observation and his warning has proven to be true.

Last night, America was allowed to observe something quite common at our universities, a democrat brown shirt rent-a-mob comprised of Black Lives Matter (BLM, aka BoweL Movement), La Raza,  Bernie Sanders supporters, all instigated by Moveon.org (George Soros bunch) violently stopped a Donald Trump rally in Chicago.  Conservative speakers are routinely shut down at our universities by radical leftists.  Their tactics right out of the NAZI playbook.  Due to media black out, the average ignorant American citizen has no clue how oppressive the atmosphere at our universities are.  There is no dissent, it won’t be tolerated.  Last night they had a ring side seat in front of the television sets.  My prediction is that Trump will be the winner of this exchange.

One of the ultimate and pressing goals of our domestic enemies, liberals (democrats) is to disarm the American people.  As is virtually always the case, liberals create the problem, then the first thing they do is attack conservatism, attack our fundamental God-given rights, then demand more power and control over our lives.

Let’s look at some recent headlines of the liberals’ call for our disarmament.

“Obama Uses Facebook to Push Gun Control”

“Obama Criticizes Congress on Gun Control Failings”

“Obama Renews Gun Control Push”

Ok, enough about Obama, we all know he’s the NRA’s number one gun saleman.

Let’s look at Obama’s mini-me, Hillary Clinton

“Hillary Clinton Says Opponents of Gun control laws Terrorize Americans”

One is enough from this criminal who’s been running to stay one step ahead of the law for decades.

We’ll list one last headline, a real laugher,

“Top Constitutional Lawyers Explain What the Second Amendment Really Says About Gun Control”  (naturally that the 2^nd Amendment doesn’t say what it says)

For liberal lawyers and judges today to claim that the 2^nd Amendment was not intended to protect our rights (uninfringed) to own firearms is laughable for those of us who can read. The Supreme Court is mentioned in the U.S. Constitution and given the following jurisdiction: Section 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;

-to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;

-to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;

-to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;

-to Controversies between two or more States;

-between a State and Citizens of another State;

-between Citizens of different States;

-between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

Hmmmm, you scratch your head looking for the vast powers it exercises today. “So, this goof, left out that part”, you say to yourself. No, my friends, that’s all there is.  Our founders never intended for an oligarchy of moron judges to control our nation, especially our social policies.  Sadly, it jumped off the tracks quickly, as the court usurped its right of “judicial review” of federal law rather quickly, in 1794, then the most famous case of Marbury vs. Madison in 1803. Then they never stopped because no one stopped them, much to our everlasting regret today.

Thomas Jefferson observed in 1823, “At the establishment of our constitution, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.”

Interestingly it was only in modern times that the floodgate opened for the Supreme Court to rule on state law, with the 1954 Brown vs. board of education.  Only a couple and more minor trampling of states rights and law had occurred prior to that point.  Now, it seems so natural that we don’t even give it a second thought, but our “supreme court” today is nothing but an extra-constitutional totalitarian institution that controls so much of our lives.

As far as what the second amendment truly means, once again if you can read, its meaning is readily apparent.  Liberals belong to what they believe is an exclusive upper caste of intellectuals who we commoners must rely on.  Our founders wrote a very simple to understand founding document (ok, at the time, I realize late 18th century English can be a bit laborious).

What would liberals think of their beloved first Amendment if it read thusly: “Freedom of speech, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to speak freely shall not be infringed.”

Their only argument in the 2nd amendment as written is the militia means a state sanctioned military organization.  Did the authors of the amendment mean that?  Prior to the constitution and the addition of the bill of rights, the colonists viewed the God-given right of private gun ownership, among other reasons, as providing a “natural right of self defense”.

All of the early state constitutions had nearly identical wording as “the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state”.  When the bill of rights was ratified, that was the background and intent of our 2nd Amendment.

As Alexander Hamilton explained, “If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens.”

As Noah Webster observed, “Before a standing army can rule the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.  The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.”

As George Mason observed, “to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them …Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.”

James Monroe said is was a basic “human right” for the people to “keep and bear arms”.

Samuel Adams, “Be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms…”

I could go on forever. Only a complete liar claims contrary to what those who fashioned our country meant.  Not a single one of our founders envisioned the people being disarmed, they all held the European powers in derision for disarming their citizens.  So, I can take the word of our modern day scoundrels masquerading as constitutional scholars or I can side with those that actually wrote and ratified our constitution.

These modern day preening fools act as if only after consulting horse livers or digging up ancient runes from the desert can we understand our constitution.  And we wonder why our country is going to hell in a hand basket as liberals slowly squeeze the life out of us.