Category Archives: The Muslim Threat to the West

Can We Bomb Civilians? 16 December 2015

One thing revealed last night at the GOP presidential debate was the ignorance of the Geneva Convention (1949) which does NOT under the circumstances in the Middle East prohibit “carpet bombing” and the attendant civilian casualties. I can understand liberals ignoring or being ignorant of what it says, but republicans should know better and it would have been a great time to educate the people who were watching because the liberal media certainly will not.

The Geneva Convention of 1949 is what is in effect and concerning non-combatants or civilians.

Article 2 states “Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter accepts and applies the provisions thereof“.

Notice it says that those powers that may be allied are bound by the treaty “in their mutual relations”, but only bound if the enemy (in this case ISIS) accepts and applies the provisions of the treaty.

Article 14 states in part, “In time of peace, the High Contracting Parties and, after the outbreak of hostilities, the Parties thereto, may establish in their own territory and, if the need arises, in occupied areas, hospital and safety zones and localities so organized as to protect from the effects of war, wounded, sick and aged persons, children under fifteen, expectant mothers and mothers of children under seven.”

Article 15 states in part, “Any Party to the conflict may, either direct or through a neutral State or some humanitarian organization, propose to the adverse Party to establish, in the regions where fighting is taking place, neutralized zones intended to shelter from the effects of war the following persons, without distinction:…”

Articles 14 and 15 establishes that warring parties MAY establish safe zones, it does not say MUST.

ART. 17. — The Parties to the conflict shall endeavour to
conclude local agreements for the removal from besieged or
encircled areas,of wounded, sick, infirm and aged persons, children
and maternity cases, and for the passage of ministers of all religions,
medical personnel and medical equipment on their way to such
areas.

Notice 17 does mandate that Parties shall ENDEAVOR to conclude local agreements…(it takes two, do you really think ISIS, which depends on civilian shields to conclude any agreement?)

Articles 18-23 basically establishes hospitals, ambulances, air flights carrying wounded as off limits,

Article 19 says in part, “The protection to which civilian hospitals are entitled shall not cease unless they are used to commit, outside their humanitarian duties, acts harmful to the enemy. Protection may, however, cease only after due warning has been given, naming, in all appropriate cases, a reasonable time limit, and after such warning has remained unheeded…”

In other words, terrorists like Hamas and ISIS that hide behind human shields and hospitals are not protected as they are “used to commit…acts harmful to the enemy”.

Article 28 couldn’t be more clear as it says in its entirety, “The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.”

Such feral humans as Hamas and ISIS in no way shape or form follow any provisions of the Geneva convention. They remind one of the ruthless monsters on the movie “Aliens”. The GC is intended for relatively civilized nations. It does not require the signatories to fight a ruthless inhuman enemy with kid gloves, when that enemy’s extinction is necessary. These muslims deliberately use humans as shields, just daring us to take them out. As regrettable as “innocent” civilian casualties are, this is war.

The Jihadist assault in California – 4 December 2015

 

America was rocked this week as two muslim jihadists decided to make their move and take out as many defenseless and innocent Americans as possible.  It was a dastardly attack, as muslims are wont to engage in.  Apparently, there’s nothing like the sweet aroma of gunpowder in their nostrils to accompany the screams of their defenseless victims.  One must wonder how it must feel when a machete makes contact with the human neck, or how hard one would have to pull a knife across the carotid of a victim, or what it must be like standing with one’s associates as you gun down a line of prisoners on their knees facing away from you, or the smell of human flesh burning after being dowsed with gasoline or diesel fuel and set ablaze.

Westerners, until recently, would only have considered such things when the nazi or communist atrocities were remembered, although few if any Americans actually witnessed their actions and few saw moving pictures of the atrocities contemporaneously.  Somehow, those were viewed almost in a detached way and they happened in another galaxy, far far away.  The contemplation and argument then was how could western and enlightened men, at least in Germany, degrade to such a feral state.

The western mind is having great difficulty in fathoming the Islamic mind and most refuse to come to grips with the truth of it.  The western mind attempts to impute some sort of western human values where there are none.  Where the western mind is often motivated by pity, remorse and even kindness, it’s difficult to grasp that there are a large percentage of humanity that is missing these seemingly so basic emotions and traits.  It’s as if the muslim is another sub-species of homo sapiens altogether.

However, islam does have a strange ally, liberalism.  While the two share many things in common, ultimately they are not compatible.  Islam demands allegiance and submission to allah, liberals demand allegiance and submission to the State.  “There can only be one”, yet they find themselves as allies against a common enemy, the truly western man, especially the truly American man.

Liberals in America have simply added muslims to their gang of special interest minority groups.  They’ll worry about the consequences later.  Surely, when the time comes, an all-powerful government will triumph over a group of fanatics loyal to a god that doesn’t exist.  They’ll allow their brand of opium for a time to exist without criticism and in return will expect their votes come election day.  Islam in America also enables to the liberals to attack Christianity.  Just as the forefathers of America’s liberals, the French Revolutionists, smashed churches and symbols of Christianity in France, the muslims will be their attack dogs here.

Obama, the jester, Hillary the Hag and Bernie the commie are all vying to see just how many muslims they can import into this country.  While real Americans recoil at the thought of one, they want tens of thousands, millions even, the more the better.

The two jihadists, husband and wife team, one a government worker, the other a pharmacist, appeared to be living the “American Dream”, money, a baby, good jobs, a nice house in a nice neighborhood.  By any measure or reasoning, these muslims would be the “best” one could hope for for any of the hundreds of thousands Obama is allowing into the country already and wanting to import more.  “Vetting”, is nothing but a rather superficial consideration of the potential immigrant based on nothing but interviews.  These two mad dogs would have easily passed the Vetting process.  Yet, the democrats desperately want more and more of them.

“These refugees are subject to the highest level security checks of any category of traveler to the United States,” according to State Department spokesman Mark Toner. “We think we can do this safely and in a way that reflects American values.”

“Apparently they’re scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America,” Obama said. “At first, they were too scared of the press being too tough on them in the debates,” he added. “Now they are scared of three year old orphans. That doesn’t seem so tough to me.”  (actually goof ball, we’re afraid of these “three year old orphans” when they grow up)

“I would like to see us move from what is a good start with 10,000, to 65,000, and begin immediately to put into place the mechanisms for vetting the people that we would take in, looking to really emphasize some of those who are most vulnerable,” Clinton said … (the most vulnerable are us, normal Americans)

Over the past few days, liberals have used such idiot terms as a “mystery” as they try their best to determine what motivated muslim killers. Poor liberals are just beside themselves trying to make every excuse in the book for them in order to avoid the truth, they were muslims, dedicated muslims. Should this prompt us to have a “religious tests” for immigrants? Yes, of course, but not according to the democrats and some idiot republicans.

Obama – “And so we have to, each of us, do our part.  And the United States has to step up and do its part. And when I hear folks say that, well, maybe we should just admit the Christians but not the Muslims; when I hear political leaders suggesting that there would be a religious test for which a person who’s fleeing from a war-torn country is admitted…That’s not who we are. We don’t have religious tests to our compassion.”  (how about religious tests for our safety)

Paul Ryan (idiot) – “I don’t think a religious test is appropriate. That’s not who we are. We believe in the First Amendment and religious freedom.”  (I missed the part about the constitution applicable to foreigners overseas)

Hillary – “We’ve seen a lot of hateful rhetoric from the GOP. But the idea that we’d turn away refugees because of religion is a new low.”  (Actually, pretty smart)

Trump and Cruz have made it clear they truly understand islam and its danger to America. I realize the typical democrat dolt is stuck on fighting for the right to sodomize and rip babies out of wombs, but now we’re actually talking about national survival and preventing blood from flowing in the streets and body parts flying as a result of actions by those who practice the religion of “pieces” allowed into this country. Its time to grow up and put childish things behind and do what’s right for America, do it for yourselves if nothing else. Your life may depend on it.

Why we have a Muslim Problem 20 November 2015

 

Our muslim problem is a self-inflicted one as western liberals have used the importation of muslims, as well as Hispanics, into our midst as a means of fracturing our American culture and homogeneity.  It’s a part and becoming a very significant part of the liberal war on American culture, conducted under the liberal banner of “multiculturalism”.  We’ve all heard the term, probably are sick of hearing it as its one of our liberal’s favorite terms.

Liberalism has advanced in our nation and the West as a whole by basically wearing out the normal average citizen.  By making the citizens so tired of hearing about this or that, that they finally tune it out and move on.  By now, who really cares all that much about “multiculturalism”?  Have most of our citizens finally thrown their hands up in the air and have concluded that, while America has become somewhat balkanized, divided into groups, there is still such an overwhelming single American culture that our multi-cultures do not pose all that much of a risk to our nation?

Choosing the on-line Encyclopædia Britannica website to lift a definition of “multiculturalism” we find –

Multiculturalism, the view that cultures, races, and ethnicities, particularly those of minority groups, deserve special acknowledgement of their differences within a dominant political culture. 

That acknowledgement can take the forms of recognition of contributions to the cultural life of the political community as a whole, a demand for special protection under the law for certain cultural groups, or autonomous rights of governance for certain cultures. Multiculturalism is both a response to the fact of cultural pluralism in modern democracies and a way of compensating cultural groups for past exclusion, discrimination, and oppression 

Most modern democracies comprise members with diverse cultural viewpoints, practices, and contributions. Many minority cultural groups have experienced exclusion or the denigration of their contributions and identities in the past. Multiculturalism seeks the inclusion of the views and contributions of diverse members of society while maintaining respect for their differences and withholding the demand for their assimilation into the dominant culture. 

Multiculturalism stands as a challenge to liberal democracy. In liberal democracies (classic definitions, not liberal democrats!!), all citizens should be treated equally under the law by abstracting the common identity of “citizen” from the real social, cultural, political, and economic positions and identities of real members of society. That leads to a tendency to homogenize the collective of citizens and assume a common political culture that all participate in.

However, that abstract view ignores other politically salient features of the identities of political subjects that exceed the category of citizen, such as race, religion, class, and sex. Although claiming the formal equality of citizens, the liberal democratic view tends to underemphasize ways in which citizens are not in fact equal in society. Rather than embracing the traditional liberal image of the melting pot into which people of different cultures are assimilated into a unified national culture, multiculturalism generally holds the image of a tossed salad to be more appropriate. Although being an integral and recognizable part of the whole, diverse members of society can maintain their particular identities while residing in the collective. 

Some more-radical multicultural theorists have claimed that some cultural groups need more than recognition to ensure the integrity and maintenance of their distinct identities and contributions. In addition to individual equal rights, some have advocated for special group rights and autonomous governance for certain cultural groups. Because the continued existence of protected minority cultures ultimately contributes to the good of all and the enrichment of the dominant culture, those theorists have argued that the preserving of cultures that cannot withstand the pressures to assimilate into a dominant culture can be given preference over the usual norm of equal rights for all.

_______________________________________________________________________

The “culture war” that rages inside our borders is between the traditionalists who value traditional American Culture and the democrat party that deploys multiculturalism as a weapon to destroy it.  Logic dictates that if liberals win this battle, America will no longer be America, but rather a nation divided into irreconcilable groups seething with rage.  Liberals/Socialists/Democrats (LSDs) have been playing this divide and conquer game for several decades now and their assault on America has culminated with the two elections of Obama.  Whether America is lost remains to be seen, but we must grasp the fact that it is in critical condition.

Obama is not a product of the real world, but of radical academia.  Our colleges and universities are staffed by liberals, overwhelmingly.  More than 70 percent identify as liberals, less than 10 percent, conservatives.  The “elite” schools are even worse, 96 percent of the Harvard faculty vote for democrats.  Our schools have gone mad, where wild anti-white racism and anti-Americanism run rampant as we’ve noted this past week at several college campuses across America.

The education system has spent at least the last two generations bringing us to the point where we are today, where blacks, especially, are currently rioting on several campuses screaming “black lives matter”, intimidating and actually engaging in physical violence.  Now “racism” and “micro-aggressions” are discovered under every rock or turn of the page.

Going hand in hand with multiculturalism is “Political Correctness”, which means any speech must be such that it cannot be perceived as negative toward a minority group.  It’s not politically correct for instance, to say that nearly 80 percent of all violent crime is committed by blacks, or to say that homosexuals are up to 14 times more likely than the general population to commit suicide, or up to 7 times higher for alcoholism, or 19 times higher for drug abuse, or that the queer men make up 76 percent of our population with aids.  Near identical statistics used to be put out by our CDC until it became politically incorrect to do so.  The statistics just stated were from the Canadian Healthcare System report of earlier this year.

Rape, murder and other violent assaults on white European women by the muslim invaders in their midst dominates crime statistics from Europe.  There’s no use in repeating in this posting what you can easily find yourself on the internet.  Our main stream media, i.e. the democrat media has no intention of ever revealing the carnage and destruction that muslim invaders are wrecking in Europe because they actually want the exact same thing to take place here in America.  Obama and his crowd are dedicated to destroying American culture and islam is tailor made to be the wrecking crane to conduct this deconstruction of America.

However, just to spur you on to become an informed citizen, type in “muslim rape and assault statistics in Europe” in a search engine and read away.  Two quick examples are as follows:

In 2012, it emerged that over a thousand mostly white young girls in the northern England town of Rotherham were systematically groomed, trafficked, beaten and sexually abused by rape gangs consisting of mainly Pakistani Muslim men. A report released earlier this month confirmed that the local Labour government council and the police covered up this horror because they were afraid of being characterized as racist or politically incorrect. 

For over 15 years, criminal rape gangs were protected by the authorities because of their foreign ethnicity. Meanwhile, young girls were being beaten and raped, then ignored, labeled liars and left defenseless because they were white… 

Crime rates broken down by nationality in Denmark show that individuals from Muslim countries make up eight of the top nine places on the list. In addition, 2012 figures show that Somalis were sentenced for crimes, including innumerable sexual assaults, almost ten times more often than those with Danish citizenship. 

Indeed, more than half of all convicted rapists in Denmark have an immigrant background, according to official statistics, despite the fact that immigrants and their descendants account for less than 10 per cent of the population. “Iraqis, Iranians, Turks and Somalis are dramatically overrepresented among convicted rapists in Denmark,” reports BT.dk. 

When Lars Hedegaard, the President of the Danish (and International) Free Press Society, drew attention to these shocking statistics, he wasn’t hailed by feminist groups for shedding much needed light on the matter, he was found guilty of “hate speech” under section 266b of the Danish penal code… 

Since it embraced multiculturalism in 1975, Sweden has become the rape capital of the west, with only the tiny African nation of Lesotho recording more sexual assaults. 

Rapes in Sweden have skyrocketed by a shocking 1,472% since the mid-70’s, with 6,620 sexual assaults being reported to police in 2014 compared to just 421 in 1975. 

“77.6 percent of the country’s rapists are identified as “foreigners” (and that’s significant because in Sweden, “foreigner” is generally synonymous with “immigrant from Muslim country”), writes Selwyn Duke. “And even this likely understates the issue, since the Swedish government — in an effort to obscure the problem — records second-generation Muslim perpetrators simply as “Swedes.”… 

In Norway, almost half of all rapes committed in Oslo in 2011 were carried out by individuals of African, Middle Eastern or Asian origin, despite the fact that Muslim immigrants only represent 1.5-2 per cent of the population.In addition, 100 per cent of aggravated rapes involving physical violence were committed by individuals of African, Middle Eastern or Asian origin. 

Leftist political leaders responded to the figures by absolving “traumatized asylum seekers” of blame and instead pointed fingers at police for encouraging “xenophobia and prejudice” merely for reporting the statistics…(Infowars – Feminists Mute on Muslim Rape Epidemic Sweeping Europe, February 19, 2015)

_______________________________________________________________________

From the website “digitaljournal.com” March 20, 2013, we read: 

Muslim gang-rapes across Europe under-reported in press

High profile-gang rapes in India have been in the headlines since December. The phenomenon is growing across Europe too, but tends to be under reported due to the high incidence of Muslim perpetrators hich makes it politically incorrect to mention.

In December 2011 a Swedish mother-of-two was subjected to a brutal gang-rape by 12 Afghan immigrants in a refugee camp in Mariannelund. Reports stated “The rape was oral, anal and vaginal sometimes with three rapists inside her at the same time while everybody was cheering and clapping. The gruesome rape marathon lasted for 7 hours. 11 suspects may have been involved taking turns while drinking and getting high on drugs. The asylum seekers were cheering and clapping their hands during the rape marathon while calling the victim “whore” and “slut”.”  

_______________________________________________________________________

And the democrats want to import this into America.  They appear to be gearing up for their final assault on America to at last conquer it and turn it into a socialist hell hole where they, our enlightened master will hold all of the power.

“We are not a nation that delivers children back into the hands of ISIS murderers because some politician doesn’t like their religion,” she continued, “and we are not a nation that backs down out of fear.”  Elizabeth Warren on the Senate floor 11/17/2015

“…we should increase numbers of refugees. The administration originally said 10 (thousand). I said we should go to 65, but only if we have as careful a screening and vetting process as we can imagine, whatever resources it takes.”  Hillary Clinton during the democrat debate 11/14/2015, one day after the Paris, France slaughter!!

“Apparently, they (Republicans) are scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America,” the president said. “At first they were too scared of the press being too tough on them in the debates. Now they are scared of 3-year-old orphans. That doesn’t seem so tough to me.”  Barack Hussein Obama

We might be inclined to say that these democrat leaders are simply fools, divorced from any sense of reality, but are they?  Or do they have an agenda?  Their agenda is to complete the final destruction of America as any sort of cohesive nation.  Their agenda is to destroy traditional American culture and turn it into a nation, a multi-culture incapable of rallying around a set of central principles.  This is what Obama meant by his “transformation” of the nation, and the democrat party, like children, following the Pied Piper are nearly all on board with this.

At the beginning of this article we read the definition of Multiculturalism.  Look at the emphasized phrases, “special acknowledgement of their differences …demand for special protection under the law… autonomous rights…compensating cultural groups for past exclusion, discrimination, and oppression…seeks the inclusion of the views and contributions of diverse members…diverse members of society can maintain their particular identities while residing in the collective…special group rights… preference over the usual norm of equal rights for all”. 

Whether, radical silly women who hate men, homosexuals and other deviants, blacks, hispanics, girly boys or muslims, the democrat coalition advances all of these trademarks of multiculturalism and political correctness.  The media refuses to identify minorities as perpetrators, instead simply calling them “youths”.  Texas police authorities are now identifying Hispanics as “white” to skew statistics.  Muslim attacks in America are never identified as racially or religiously motivated.  Instead some instances are classified as “work place violence” while others prompt a call for some psychological evaluation because the authorities can’t figure out why little Mohammed went nuts and killed some whities.

As we consider the condition of the muslim invasion of Europe and its consequences as touched on above, we must realize that what is happening there is the democrat blueprint for America’s.

There was an article on the Americanthinker.com website on 11/20/2015, entitled “Europe’s Scoffing its way to Annihilation”, written by Andrew Longman.  He observed that

Europe is convinced – utterly – of the superiority of its civilization.  Europe today has no questions.  It “knows” there’s no God.  It knows that socialism in a secular liberal democracy is supreme.  It knows that atheistic science is the only science allowed to be done.  It knows that wanton sex isn’t just a right, but an entertainment industry orthogonal to morality.   

It knows that abortion is a shrug of the shoulders and… the continent “knows” that religion is a thing of the past.  And it knows that the march towards dissolution of personal sovereignty, national sovereignty, is an inevitable fact of evolution, evolution being the unquestionable god of all things. 

And all that evidence-free fundamentalist secular-liberal certainty is becoming Europe’s complete undoing…Europe has no knowledge that it is psychologically programmed to be indifferent to God… And so this is how Europe dies – obediently, collectively.  The Muslims enter, wild and uncontrolled, individuality as a suicide bomb, caring not for exalted systems.  Burn it; Europeans can’t grasp the euro disobeyed.  Europe can’t grasp dying for God, while Islamists lust for it…

Sooner or later, they think, the Muslims will figure out that a highly paid job at Bosch with state health care, state college education, state direction for your life, unlimited access to state-approved hookers, state certification and training for your every impetus – that this will somehow be honey so compelling that all these little passions about Islam will leave the head, and drugged up drones will trot off to precision assembly training.  Europe’s belief is the unsupported presumption of universal atheism… 

 But there’s no force in Europe’s bucolic Animal Farm.  Muslims believe in force – they make babies, they make war, they make demands, and they use whatever violence they have to weaponize all those things.  Europe does not make babies, does not make war, does not make demands on Muslims.  Instead, Europe purses its brow and wonders how long the realization of European superiority will take to dawn in the mind of the Ummah.  Europe de-weaponizes everything; Muslims sneer, shrug, and reload.” 

_____________________________________________________________________

Our American liberals are of the same mold as their European counterparts.  All are functional atheists, regardless of their claims otherwise.  Hillary, as a sop for the little people, trots out her Methodist upbringing.  Obama made much of his two decade attendance at Jeremiah Wright’s Black Liberation Theology church until the veil was lifted exposing the church and its theology for what it was, Marxism and anti-Americanism disguised as religion.

LSDs always in presenting their case trot out “individuals”.  In every large group there are almost always all sorts of individuals because a group is made up of individuals (duh).  Were there decent Nazis?  How about Nazi party member Oskar Schindler?  We all know that story, largely thanks to the movie Schindler’s List.  Here’s one you may not have heard of, Albert Goering.  Yes, Hermann’s brother. An interesting story on the UK Daily Mail of April 8, 2010 tells us a tale of this man who worked to save Jews, not exterminate them.  While not a Nazi party member, Albert was “Nazi royalty” due to his brother,  but worked against them and his brother actually protected him.

“Standing before the war crimes investigators, the German prisoner hung his head.  It was May, 1945 and he was being held at the U.S. Army’s interrogation center in Augsburg, Bavaria.            

A soldier marked his name off on a list: Goering.  

But this was not Hermann Goering, Hitler’s right-hand-man; Commander of the Luftwaffe and architect of the Holocaust – ‘the final solution’.  

No, Hermann Goering waited down the corridor in cell number 5. The man who stood here, defending himself against a charge of complicity with the Nazi regime, was Hermann’s brother, Albert.  

Surely, his guilt too, was beyond doubt.  But lifting his head, Albert Goering told the investigators an extraordinary story.  He said that he had used his family name – by now synonymous with evil – to help innumerable Jews escape the clutches of the Gastapo.  

Risking his own life, he had saved old Jewish ladies from being humiliated by Nazis in the street and set up money-smuggling syndicates to spirit refugees across the border.  Most daringly of all, he had driven to a concentration camp and convinced guards to load hundreds of Jews into trucks before driving them to freedom.  Three times he had evaded Gestapo arrest warrants. 

The tale he spun was one of heroism, espionage and audacity.  The investigators looked at each other incredulously…The man before them was, after all, Nazi royalty thanks to his high-ranking brother.  Surely this was a desperate ploy to whitewash the death penalty…Undeterred, Albert handed his interrogators a list of 34 names written across five sheets of paper – people he had personally rescued.  The list would eventually secure his freedom, for Albert Goering was indeed the heroic man he described. 

Now his story is told for the first time in a book, Thirty Four, by William Hastings Burke.”

Interestingly despite being exact opposites politically and even humanly, both men, “in this private world…remained devoted brothers”.  Hermann saved Albert’s life several times after being captured by Nazi authorities and quashed arrest warrants put out by the SS.

“Hermann would later tell an American psychiatrist from his Nuremburg cell: ‘Albert was always the antithesis of myself.  He was not politically or militarily interested.  He was quiet, reclusive.  I like crowds and company.  He was melancholic and pessimistic and I am an optimist.  But he’s not a bad fellow, Albert.’ “ 

____________________________________________________________________

The issue isn’t the individual that democrats may trot out to convince the world the muslims or any member of any group for that matter may not be “a bad fellow”.   Any rational and fair minded American values the contribution of individuals from all races and most religions that comprise our citizenry.  The issue is the group, it’s all a matter of statistics.  25 percent of younger muslims in America according to reliable polling have no problem with suicide bombing.  About 40 percent of Pakistanis approve of suicide bombing attacks against Americans.  83% of “Palestinians” approve, 62% of Jordanians, 42% of Turks, about 30% of Egyptians, etc.  Ten percent of native born “American” muslims have a favorable opinion of Al-Qaeda (how about ISIS?).  All across the islamic world, America is viewed by a startlingly high percentage of muslims to be destroyed.

Let’s be conservative and say that 33 percent of all muslims hate America and what it stands for.  Would you buy a car that the manufacturer has put out a warning on that one of three of their new models at the car lot will explode unexpectedly at some point soon after driving it off the lot?  Yet, LSDs want to bring in millions of muslims of which is an element, a significant element, that will never assimilate, has no desire to assimilate or even accommodate and will always work against the interests of America.

While we cannot with any certainty predict the actions of an individual, we can with certainty predict the actions of a group.  90 percent of blacks, or even higher of in the case of Obama, vote for democrats, 60 to 70 percent of Hispanics vote democrat, 70 percent of muslims vote democrat.  Is it any wonder democrats are hell bent on importing as many of these ethnic groups as possible?

Traditional Americans have thoroughly rejected the atheistic socialism of the democrat party.  LSDs have been harvesting the lush fields of the third world to find enough voters to outnumber normal Americans.  These third worlders will trade off their own religious and moral values for the relative wealth promised to them by the democrats taken from productive Americans.

If you think liberals are bad enough in wanting to destroy all of the symbols of our Judeo-Christian heritage and beliefs in America, wait until the muslim population grows just a bit more.  Liberals whine and take you to court before a like-minded liberal judge to get his way.  Muslims will simply attack you, rape your women folk and burn your house down.

No, “president” Obama, republicans and concerned American citizens aren’t afraid of three year old Syrians (well, not until they grow up), we’re afraid of the millions of muslims your party wants to import for the purpose of destroying our culture.  We’re afraid of the day when a “presidency” such as yours is the norm, not an aberration.

Barbarians at and Inside the Gates – 16 November 2015

Muslims at their leisure launched another attack against the West in Paris, on Friday, the 13th of November.  Such attacks were predicted, certain really, as the West has allowed this violent strain of humanity inside its gates.  Most of its cult followers are more than inclined to follow the teaching of Mohammed in the fifth verse of the ninth Sura of the Koran rag which states, “fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them, and seize them, beleaguer them and lie in wait for them in every scheme.”

Polling of muslims who infest America usually yields fairly consistent results.  The most shocking opinion expressed by these muslims is that nearly 25 percent support suicide bombing.  That goes along with half wanting to see America subject to Sharia law, but can we expect anything different from this bunch.

The main stream media (democrat media) and liberal researchers usually inflate their numbers in order to increase their political and cultural importance (the same for homosexuals), but if we use their likely inflated number of about 7 million, then that means there may well be close to two million Bin Laden wannabees lurking in our nation.  Certainly liberals want to increase their numbers as fast as possible as they’re ready made allies in their war on America.

America’s founding religion and ethos tells us to love our neighbor, muslims are compelled by their religion to either kill, enslave or convert at the end of a gun barrel.  Islam is not simply a false Satanic religion, but it is a philosophy of conquest.  Mohammad, its lunatic founder, rose to prominence by waylaying caravans, then as his power and the size of his pirate gang grew, he eventually conquered the middle-east and from there all the way to Western India.

We ignore islam at our peril, it is dangerous because it is being enabled and aided by our domestic enemies, the democrats.  The democrat party is nothing more than an amalgamation of various disgruntled minorities, both real and imagined, who are being “harmed” by traditional American culture and values.  Think about it, the democrat party’s only appeal is to radicalized man hating silly women, blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals and other sexual deviants, girly men, environmental wackos, young people who are products of the liberal public education mills and their latest group, the muslims.

Democrats don’t even bother to make a pretense any longer of being a mainstream political party.  Of course, they claim to be the mainstream and their media constantly echoes that claim, but all evidence and polling indicates otherwise.  Only their incredible ability to lie and their reliance on their propaganda machines allow them to fool enough Low Information Voters to get elected in most areas of the nation.  The only play in the democrat play book is divide and conquer, ginning up hatred in the minds of its disparate groups that white conservatives are out to get them.  The “war on women”, “homophobia”, “islamophobia”, “racism” is just about all they have going for them.

Two of the groups, deviants and muslims, are interestingly polar opposites in most ways except they find their common ground in their hatred for American values.  Their value to democrats, aside from their voting and money, is that they enhance the democrats’ ability to assault and degrade the Judeo-Christian foundations of our nation.  In the democrat camp at this moment is a race to see who can advocate bringing in the most “Syrian refugees” with Hillary trying to outbid all of the others.  Diluting to the point that America is stripped of the cultural glue that holds it together is the goal of the democrat party.

The battle for the heart, soul and survival of America waged fiercely Monday, November 16th, as the democrats doubled down on their intent to bring as many savages as possible into our nation while the republican spines stiffened considerably.  19 states, all led by republican governors and one state, New Hampshire, led by a democrat called for no resettlement in their states.  Six governors, all democrats, proclaimed they welcomed “refugee” resettlement into their states.

Obama still has his own ban on allowing any true refugees from the war torn middle- east, the Christians, from entering the nation at all.  The Christians in these arab countries are being exterminated, targeted by all muslim sides of their civil war.

Obama, mouthing his usual nonsense (every time his lips move) today said it was “shameful” that our nation would have any sort of religious tests in considering these “refugees”, “That’s not American…That’s not who we are. We do not have religious tests to our compassion.”

Democrats don’t believe in the dangers of islam, in fact, as you know, they all refuse to use even the term “radical islam” (as if there’s any other type).  The administration maintains that any refugees resettled into our midst will be carefully screened and vetted.  This consists of two interviews with the “refugee” himself conducted by drones from the State Department and Homeland Security.

I can just imagine how these interviews go,

“Are you a terrorist?”   “Huhhhh, no”

“Have you ever been or do you plan to engage in terrorist activities?”       “Huhhh, no”

“What will you do to contribute to America?”      “I will be a good voter for democrats.”

“Excellent, welcome to America!”

________________________________________________________________________

“If you have a handful of people who don’t mind dying, they can kill a lot of people”, Obama said today, so just how many “handfuls” are going be imbedded into the tens of thousands of these “refugees” the democrats want in this country and their liberal European counterparts want in theirs?