Does anyone think the media are overplaying their hand in their zeal to see Hillary Clinton as our next president?  They’re actually embarrassing themselves, but their foolishness may work to Trump’s advantage, as the only institution in America with a lower approval rating that the U.S. Congress is our fourth estate, the press.  It has reached a point now, that whoever or whatever they’re cheering for has the opposite effect of driving most Americans to the contrary position, whether the global warming hoax they advocate for or the presidency of Hillary Clinton.

I’ve come up with a new name for RINOs who run at the first sign of trouble, they’re the “LGBT Brigade” in Trump’s army.  These weasels pay lip service to supporting Trump but jump on whatever liberal bandwagon that comes along as it assaults Trump.  These poor RINOs just can’t get a break.  On one hand they really don’t want to alienate the majority of Americans, yet on the other they crave positive attention from the liberal press.  In presidential election years, there’s just no middle ground for them.

Anyone who has ever been in the military, myself included, or any rational American knows that homosexuals and other deviants are just taking up space in the military, being used as liberal pawns as they attempt to reengineer the military after their own vision to be weak, incoherent and ineffectual.  The deviant bunch are all in favor of military service as long as they can get every accommodation they want and draw a very generous paycheck for doing very little.  RINOs play a similar part in the republican party, they take up space as they ride in the wagon and neither push nor pull.

What we have witnessed over the past week has been a brilliant psychological operation played out with near perfection by the democrat party.  The republican national convention was generally well received by the American people and Trump was presented as a very capable candidate.  Cruz did some damage with his treachery, but all in all, Trump had a very good week.

The democrat convention, not so much.  It started off with Moochelle giving her speech to start off the prime time coverage whining about living in the Whitehouse that slaves built and it went downhill after that.  For those with the stomach to watch it, mothers of dispatched thugs, including the mothers of Obama’s adopted son Trayvon and sweet cuddly big Mike Brown unbelievably had their turns at the democrat podium.  Obviously, the democrats were positioning themselves well on the side of the Black Thugs Matter movement and stand in opposition to our nation’s law enforcement and law and order itself.

Do you realize that democrats are glorifying black thugs whose “killers” were exonerated in front of a jury or cleared by determined (to see them hanged) prosecutors overseen by a radical DOJ out for cop’s blood? What they are saying is that the overall society is responsible for their deaths, i.e., “white” society is responsible for their deaths.

Did you, perchance, convince Obama’s son, sweet Trayvon to jump the “white” hispanic and start bashing his head against the concrete? Did any of you talk lovable teddy bear “L’il” Mike Brown to strong arm a defenseless much smaller white kid as he robbed his store? Did you encourage “L’il” Mike to assault the cop and attempt to disarm him?

Failing and failed black “youth” only have two things to blame for their plight, themselves and their community. Only 30 percent have their father at home, their peers make it almost impossible for them to act “white”, that is to say, civilized, to obey rules, to study in school, to aspire to make anything out of themselves over than thugs.

What the democrats are glorifying should be condemned. Excusing criminal and thuggish behavior only creates more of it. We do need “law and order” and no, that’s not racist, that’s just what everyone else with some desire to be productive citizens engage in and advocate.

The crowning achievement of the DNC was the ploy to have Khizr Khan speak and attack Donald Trump for wanting to prevent unvetted muslims from entering our nation, the same unusually violent strain of muslim that killed his very son.

The last two weeks tells a tale of two political parties and one media.

Four Americans were slaughtered in Benghazi, Libya in a most foul way by islamic butchers.

The day after that Hillary informs spawn Chelsea and the leader of Egypt that it was a terrorist assault.

A few days after that Hillary promises the mothers of those slain in Libya that a nobody made a movie critical of Mo and that the government would take any and all measures to make sure he pays.

Days and weeks after that, obama, Hillary, Susan Rice and other administration clowns continued the lie about the “movie maker”.

Much later, just recently, Hillary now calls the “gold star” mothers of those slain in Benghazi, liars, claiming she never told them that, that they “misunderstood”. The media yawns and gives about 70 seconds coverage to these suffering mothers.

The Khan’s son was an officer in the U.S. Army and was blown up in Iraq by savage killers in 2004.

More than a decade later, Khan, a Pakistani, radicalized by way of Saudi Arabia, now a citizen of the United States starts a political organization to facilitate muslim immigration and further to strongly “encourage” them to vote democrat.

Mr. Khan is invited to give a speech at the DNC in order to pound Trump who only wants to keep unvetted muslims from Sharia compliant nations out until “things can be figured out”.

Khan, obviously totally ignorant of the constitution, other than it is a little booklet he can lift up as a prop, declares that the United States must have open borders according to the constitution, that the rest of the world has a constitutional right to pile in on us. He criticizes Trump for attempting to save the nation from the very sort of savage that killed his son.  The mothers get 70 seconds of media coverage following their speeches, Khan has received countless hours so far and still counting.

Hillary now calls some “Gold Star” mothers liars, Trump merely wants to keep safe all Americans, including the muslims who are here.

No one criticizes Hillary, but Trump is being pilloried from all sides 24/7. Why is that?

The answer of course, is that democrats want millions of muslims in our midst in order to harvest their violence and hatred of Christianity and focus it on the continued destruction of American culture.  Obama, Hillary, democrats and several RINOs keep talking about allowing tens of thousands more of these unvetted muslims from the middle east into our country.  Do you realize that we could keep 12 muslims safe in their own regions, in safe zones if we would only create them, for what it costs to bring just one to our shores?

This isn’t rocket science.  It’s just plain old common sense.  America does not need a single muslim in our country in order to improve itself.  Democrats are diluting America on purpose.  Traditional, constitution and freedom loving Americans have long rejected the democrat message.  Now it is only being supported by their minorities who’ve they convinced to hate America and our own youth who are being programmed in the democrat “education” mills.

Interesting how quickly “republicans” (aka RINOs) quickly flee from Trump at the first sign of liberal provocation.  Trump is the Commander-in-Chief of the American Patriot forces and these RINOs act like they make up a battalion of LGBT socially engineered powder puffs, ready to flee at the first signs of combat.

The news cycle today and over the past few days deals with Trump’s reaction to being attacked by the “grieving” muslim father, Khizr Khan, of a son who was killed in Irag more than a decade ago while serving in the U.S. Army by a radical islamist’s roadside bomb.  The parents stood on the stage at the Democrat National Convention to deliver a scathing diatribe against Trump.  One must wonder, considering that his son was killed by “radical” muslims why he wasn’t at the RNC giving a speech in support of Trump.

So, who exactly is this Khan family?  Just concerned citizens upset that Trump is calling for a halt of the invasion of millions of unvetted muslims into this country, thousands of the exact sort that killed his son in a most dishonorable way or perhaps a family with an agenda that should give us cause for concern?

One must wonder, how did this couple come to the attention of the democrat party and exactly why would the parents of a fallen soldier actually side with the democrats who typically “loathe” the military over a party and especially this particular candidate, Donald Trump, who has made supporting the military a signature issue?

This support not only calls for rebuilding a decimated and demoralized military due to Obama’s “transformation” of it into the Village People, but also promising not to unnecessarily engage our military in these never ending “family” feuds in the middle east.  If there’s one thing that many Americans have learned is that it is impossible to take 1.6 billion muslims who have no love for peace, liberty and modernity and force them to act civilized.

It has become clear that our best option is to help and protect Israel and let “allah” sort out most of the rest of the region.  Muslims killing muslims is not all that bad of an ongoing process in the middle east.  It is their nature to do one of two things, either war against others or war against each other and clearly, the latter is preferable.

Regardless of what one thinks of muslims in general and certainly my view of them is very dim, there are radical, feral and violent muslims who are the chief killers and murderers of the more “moderate” and “peaceful” muslims.  More muslims are killed by other muslims than who are killed by “infidels” by a factor of many multiples.

What we are witnessing is a psychological operation being conducted by the democrats that is, to be honest, pretty ingenious.  Mr. Khan has done nothing but parrot the Obama/Hillary/Democrat line that the more muslims we allow inside our country the merrier.  Hillary wants to increase muslim refugee immigration by more than five hundred percent.  The democrats used the willing Khan to be their puppet, to “prove” that muslims are constitution loving patriots, some even giving their lives in defense of this nation.

They are running their same old play of trotting out the exception to try to prove that the exception is representative of the whole.

In terms of representing islam in the U. S. Military, let’s give the young Khan, a Captain in the army every benefit of the doubt and allow that he was an exemplary officer.  He did die a hero, we should honor his sacrifice to our nation.

In 2009, Major Nidal Hasan gunned down 42 fellow soldiers, killing 13 of them at Ft. Hood, Texas.  (Recall that Obama called this “workplace violence”.)

In May, 2012, PFC Naser Abdo, was convicted of planning on detonating a bomb in a crowded restaurant in the Ft. Hood area usually packed with soldiers.  He told investigators that he intended to be outside to gun down any survivors and keep shooting until police killed him so that he could go on to his heavenly reward.

In March, 2003, in Iraq, army Sergeant Hasan Akbar threw grenades into two tents where military personnel were sleeping, killing two officers and wounding 14 soldiers.  He had written in his diary prior to the deadly assault that he was “going to try and kill as many as possible”.

There are several other incidents of muslims carrying out their duty to allah as they “serve” in our military.  There may be as many as 10,000 muslims in our military, an exact number isn’t known because many don’t identify their religion and many have western names.  There are roughly 1.4 million active duty personnel in our military who now have to watch their backs due to the growing number of muslims who are enlisting in the services.

A 2011 congressional report concluded that radicalized soldiers are a severe and emerging threat to our military.  The biggest problem is that the nation cannot prevent muslims from enlisting, and as their numbers increase, look for more and more violent incidences of these soldiers carrying out their jihads against their “brothers-in arms”.  One Islamic leader in America has been quoted as saying that “many Muslims are joining the military for outstanding training and to fight the enemy, their fellow troops”.

Since we cannot constitutionally stop muslims from joining and infiltrating our military for very nefarious purposes, what’s the next best option?  How about not allowing any more muslims to infest our nation in the first place?  Do we really need to allow a quarter million a year of them to enter our nation and set up shop in our very midst?

So who is Khizr Khan?  While liberals have failed to conduct any research into the man, he was just a grieving father who showed up out of nowhere on the DNC stage last week, true journalists have and what has been readily uncovered is startling, but when considering democrats, perhaps it shouldn’t be.

On Breitbart News, writer Matthew Boyle had this to say on August 1, 2016 –

“…Khizr Khan has all sorts of financial, legal, and political connections to the Clintons through his old law firm, the mega-D.C. firm Hogan Lovells LLP. That firm did Hillary Clinton’s taxes for years, starting when Khan still worked there, involved in, according to his own website, matters “firm wide”—back in 2004. It also has represented, for years, the government of Saudi Arabia in the United States. Saudi Arabia, of course, is a Clinton Foundation donor which—along with the mega-bundlers of thousands upon thousands in political donations to both of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2016—plays right into the “Clinton Cash” narrative.

“All of this information was publicly available, and accessible to anyone—including any of these reporters, and Breitbart News—with a basic Google search. Anyone interested in doing research about the subjects they are reporting on—otherwise known as responsible journalism—would have checked into these matters. But clearly, none in the mainstream media did—probably because, as Fox News’ Chad Pergram noted, Democrats “sense blood in the water over” the whole Khan controversy…”

Mr. Khan, it has been learned, was variously connected to the law firm that prepared Clinton’s tax returns (now should have been interesting), helped with Hillary’s home brew computer server and represented the Saudi government here in the United States.  Fortunately, the conservative media is starting to catch up and totally embarrass the liberal main stream media.  My guess is that by the end of the week, many Americans, including our RINOs are going to have a lot of egg on their face.

Currently, the most comprehensive, proof laden article which is now widely being quoted due to its well documented sources, the writings of Khizr Khan himself, is a report on Shoebat.com entitled

“What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump: He Is A Muslim Brotherhood Agent Who Wants To Advance Sharia Law And Bring Muslims Into The United States”.

Well, the title well describes that contents of the article and there’s no point in pasting quotes from it here when you can go to their site yourself.  It appears now that the Democrat Party, yes, The Party, at its national convention, gave space for a muslim, dedicated to radical sharia, the time to take on America’s great defender, Donald Trump.  It doesn’t get any more disgusting than this.  Khan’s love for strict Sharia and his close associations with the terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood, is laid out for all to see.

We can sum up this battle between Khan and Trump as Khan attacking America, demanding that it welcome all muslims who want to enter this country, that it is constitutionally mandated that our nation do so.  Trump, on the other hand, stands up for America, as a nation, as a people by saying that America has no obligation to allow a single one of them in.  It is not a right, it is a privilege and that privilege is granted by a nation based on its own best interest, not the best interest of third worlders from around the planet, especially those who have every intention of doing us harm, who intend to bring their holy war against infidels to our shores.

We began questioning the courage of the RINO heard, ready to bolt and flee the battle that wages for the heart and soul of America.  They’ve been so easily rolled by the democrat/media axis of evil.

John McCain had this to say,

“In recent days, Donald Trump disparaged a fallen soldier’s parents…He has suggested that the likes of their son should not be allowed in the United States — to say nothing of entering its service. I cannot emphasize enough how deeply I disagree with Mr. Trump’s statement. I hope Americans understand that the remarks do not represent the views of our Republican Party, its officers, or candidates…Lastly, I’d like to say to Mr. and Mrs. Khan: thank you for immigrating to America. We’re a better country because of you. And you are certainly right; your son was the best of America, and the memory of his sacrifice will make us a better nation — and he will never be forgotten.”

Huh??  We’re a better country due to the presence of Khan who acted as a Saudi agent, engaged in criminal activities with Hillary Clinton, wants to flood the nation with as many muslims as possible and institute sharia law?  Hmmm, yeah, sure.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell gave us his two cents worth –

“Captain Khan was an American hero and like all Americans I’m grateful for the sacrifices that selfless young men like Capt. Khan and their families have made in the war on terror. All Americans should value the patriotic service of the patriots who volunteer to selflessly defend us in the armed services. And as I long made clear, I agree with the Khans and families across the country that a travel ban on all members of a religion is simply contrary to American values.”

Paul Ryan –

“A religious test for entering our country is not reflective of America’s fundamental values. I reject it.”

What is Donald Trump’s position in all of this?

“Captain Humayun Khan was a hero to our country and we should honor all who have made the ultimate sacrifice to keep our country safe. The real problem here are the radical Islamic terrorists who killed him, and the efforts of these radicals to enter our country to do us further harm. Given the state of the world today, we have to know everything about those looking to enter our country, and given the state of chaos in some of these countries, that is impossible. While I feel deeply for the loss of his son, Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things. If I become President, I will make America safe again.

The media has cast aside any pretense of neutrality and has clearly abandoned its role as the watchdog of our political leaders to become nothing more than the propaganda arm of the democrat party.   Its bias represents billions of dollars worth of free campaign coverage for Hillary Clinton.  This has actually been the case with the media essentially campaigning for the democrat for about the past half century.

However, they’re getting sloppy.  In their overt hatred of republicans and shrill and often nonsensical support for democrats, most Americans are now viewing everything they say or report with a healthy measure of skepticism.   With Hillary, the media has a lot of balls to juggle and let’s face it, for the most part, most media personalities aren’t the brightest bulbs on the tree.

The Obama administration can take up some of the slack and lend a powerful helping hand.  We can assume that the IRS “investigation” into the Clinton Foundation will go nowhere, nor the same investigation being conducted by the FBI.   We can only hope that these schemes advanced against America as typified by the likes of this muslim radical Khan episode discussed above blow up in their faces and more and more Americans wake up to the extreme peril that our nation faces.

Ultimately, overcoming a significant democrat voter fraud issue, it will depend on who shows up to vote this fall.  Will it be enough to overcome fraud and overcome Hillary Clinton.  There are enough Americans to accomplish this and ultimately it will be observed that America will deserve exactly what it gets because it will get exactly what it has chosen.

Whether it will be that America the Great is fallen remains to be seen.  All great nations of the past are fallen and nothing but fading memories and America’s fall is inevitable.  The question is, does it have to happen now or can we delay it.  In about 100 days, we will find out.