Interesting how quickly “republicans” (aka RINOs) quickly flee from Trump at the first sign of liberal provocation.  Trump is the Commander-in-Chief of the American Patriot forces and these RINOs act like they make up a battalion of LGBT socially engineered powder puffs, ready to flee at the first signs of combat.

The news cycle today and over the past few days deals with Trump’s reaction to being attacked by the “grieving” muslim father, Khizr Khan, of a son who was killed in Irag more than a decade ago while serving in the U.S. Army by a radical islamist’s roadside bomb.  The parents stood on the stage at the Democrat National Convention to deliver a scathing diatribe against Trump.  One must wonder, considering that his son was killed by “radical” muslims why he wasn’t at the RNC giving a speech in support of Trump.

So, who exactly is this Khan family?  Just concerned citizens upset that Trump is calling for a halt of the invasion of millions of unvetted muslims into this country, thousands of the exact sort that killed his son in a most dishonorable way or perhaps a family with an agenda that should give us cause for concern?

One must wonder, how did this couple come to the attention of the democrat party and exactly why would the parents of a fallen soldier actually side with the democrats who typically “loathe” the military over a party and especially this particular candidate, Donald Trump, who has made supporting the military a signature issue?

This support not only calls for rebuilding a decimated and demoralized military due to Obama’s “transformation” of it into the Village People, but also promising not to unnecessarily engage our military in these never ending “family” feuds in the middle east.  If there’s one thing that many Americans have learned is that it is impossible to take 1.6 billion muslims who have no love for peace, liberty and modernity and force them to act civilized.

It has become clear that our best option is to help and protect Israel and let “allah” sort out most of the rest of the region.  Muslims killing muslims is not all that bad of an ongoing process in the middle east.  It is their nature to do one of two things, either war against others or war against each other and clearly, the latter is preferable.

Regardless of what one thinks of muslims in general and certainly my view of them is very dim, there are radical, feral and violent muslims who are the chief killers and murderers of the more “moderate” and “peaceful” muslims.  More muslims are killed by other muslims than who are killed by “infidels” by a factor of many multiples.

What we are witnessing is a psychological operation being conducted by the democrats that is, to be honest, pretty ingenious.  Mr. Khan has done nothing but parrot the Obama/Hillary/Democrat line that the more muslims we allow inside our country the merrier.  Hillary wants to increase muslim refugee immigration by more than five hundred percent.  The democrats used the willing Khan to be their puppet, to “prove” that muslims are constitution loving patriots, some even giving their lives in defense of this nation.

They are running their same old play of trotting out the exception to try to prove that the exception is representative of the whole.

In terms of representing islam in the U. S. Military, let’s give the young Khan, a Captain in the army every benefit of the doubt and allow that he was an exemplary officer.  He did die a hero, we should honor his sacrifice to our nation.

In 2009, Major Nidal Hasan gunned down 42 fellow soldiers, killing 13 of them at Ft. Hood, Texas.  (Recall that Obama called this “workplace violence”.)

In May, 2012, PFC Naser Abdo, was convicted of planning on detonating a bomb in a crowded restaurant in the Ft. Hood area usually packed with soldiers.  He told investigators that he intended to be outside to gun down any survivors and keep shooting until police killed him so that he could go on to his heavenly reward.

In March, 2003, in Iraq, army Sergeant Hasan Akbar threw grenades into two tents where military personnel were sleeping, killing two officers and wounding 14 soldiers.  He had written in his diary prior to the deadly assault that he was “going to try and kill as many as possible”.

There are several other incidents of muslims carrying out their duty to allah as they “serve” in our military.  There may be as many as 10,000 muslims in our military, an exact number isn’t known because many don’t identify their religion and many have western names.  There are roughly 1.4 million active duty personnel in our military who now have to watch their backs due to the growing number of muslims who are enlisting in the services.

A 2011 congressional report concluded that radicalized soldiers are a severe and emerging threat to our military.  The biggest problem is that the nation cannot prevent muslims from enlisting, and as their numbers increase, look for more and more violent incidences of these soldiers carrying out their jihads against their “brothers-in arms”.  One Islamic leader in America has been quoted as saying that “many Muslims are joining the military for outstanding training and to fight the enemy, their fellow troops”.

Since we cannot constitutionally stop muslims from joining and infiltrating our military for very nefarious purposes, what’s the next best option?  How about not allowing any more muslims to infest our nation in the first place?  Do we really need to allow a quarter million a year of them to enter our nation and set up shop in our very midst?

So who is Khizr Khan?  While liberals have failed to conduct any research into the man, he was just a grieving father who showed up out of nowhere on the DNC stage last week, true journalists have and what has been readily uncovered is startling, but when considering democrats, perhaps it shouldn’t be.

On Breitbart News, writer Matthew Boyle had this to say on August 1, 2016 –

“…Khizr Khan has all sorts of financial, legal, and political connections to the Clintons through his old law firm, the mega-D.C. firm Hogan Lovells LLP. That firm did Hillary Clinton’s taxes for years, starting when Khan still worked there, involved in, according to his own website, matters “firm wide”—back in 2004. It also has represented, for years, the government of Saudi Arabia in the United States. Saudi Arabia, of course, is a Clinton Foundation donor which—along with the mega-bundlers of thousands upon thousands in political donations to both of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2016—plays right into the “Clinton Cash” narrative.

“All of this information was publicly available, and accessible to anyone—including any of these reporters, and Breitbart News—with a basic Google search. Anyone interested in doing research about the subjects they are reporting on—otherwise known as responsible journalism—would have checked into these matters. But clearly, none in the mainstream media did—probably because, as Fox News’ Chad Pergram noted, Democrats “sense blood in the water over” the whole Khan controversy…”

Mr. Khan, it has been learned, was variously connected to the law firm that prepared Clinton’s tax returns (now should have been interesting), helped with Hillary’s home brew computer server and represented the Saudi government here in the United States.  Fortunately, the conservative media is starting to catch up and totally embarrass the liberal main stream media.  My guess is that by the end of the week, many Americans, including our RINOs are going to have a lot of egg on their face.

Currently, the most comprehensive, proof laden article which is now widely being quoted due to its well documented sources, the writings of Khizr Khan himself, is a report on Shoebat.com entitled

“What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump: He Is A Muslim Brotherhood Agent Who Wants To Advance Sharia Law And Bring Muslims Into The United States”.

Well, the title well describes that contents of the article and there’s no point in pasting quotes from it here when you can go to their site yourself.  It appears now that the Democrat Party, yes, The Party, at its national convention, gave space for a muslim, dedicated to radical sharia, the time to take on America’s great defender, Donald Trump.  It doesn’t get any more disgusting than this.  Khan’s love for strict Sharia and his close associations with the terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood, is laid out for all to see.

We can sum up this battle between Khan and Trump as Khan attacking America, demanding that it welcome all muslims who want to enter this country, that it is constitutionally mandated that our nation do so.  Trump, on the other hand, stands up for America, as a nation, as a people by saying that America has no obligation to allow a single one of them in.  It is not a right, it is a privilege and that privilege is granted by a nation based on its own best interest, not the best interest of third worlders from around the planet, especially those who have every intention of doing us harm, who intend to bring their holy war against infidels to our shores.

We began questioning the courage of the RINO heard, ready to bolt and flee the battle that wages for the heart and soul of America.  They’ve been so easily rolled by the democrat/media axis of evil.

John McCain had this to say,

“In recent days, Donald Trump disparaged a fallen soldier’s parents…He has suggested that the likes of their son should not be allowed in the United States — to say nothing of entering its service. I cannot emphasize enough how deeply I disagree with Mr. Trump’s statement. I hope Americans understand that the remarks do not represent the views of our Republican Party, its officers, or candidates…Lastly, I’d like to say to Mr. and Mrs. Khan: thank you for immigrating to America. We’re a better country because of you. And you are certainly right; your son was the best of America, and the memory of his sacrifice will make us a better nation — and he will never be forgotten.”

Huh??  We’re a better country due to the presence of Khan who acted as a Saudi agent, engaged in criminal activities with Hillary Clinton, wants to flood the nation with as many muslims as possible and institute sharia law?  Hmmm, yeah, sure.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell gave us his two cents worth –

“Captain Khan was an American hero and like all Americans I’m grateful for the sacrifices that selfless young men like Capt. Khan and their families have made in the war on terror. All Americans should value the patriotic service of the patriots who volunteer to selflessly defend us in the armed services. And as I long made clear, I agree with the Khans and families across the country that a travel ban on all members of a religion is simply contrary to American values.”

Paul Ryan –

“A religious test for entering our country is not reflective of America’s fundamental values. I reject it.”

What is Donald Trump’s position in all of this?

“Captain Humayun Khan was a hero to our country and we should honor all who have made the ultimate sacrifice to keep our country safe. The real problem here are the radical Islamic terrorists who killed him, and the efforts of these radicals to enter our country to do us further harm. Given the state of the world today, we have to know everything about those looking to enter our country, and given the state of chaos in some of these countries, that is impossible. While I feel deeply for the loss of his son, Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things. If I become President, I will make America safe again.

The media has cast aside any pretense of neutrality and has clearly abandoned its role as the watchdog of our political leaders to become nothing more than the propaganda arm of the democrat party.   Its bias represents billions of dollars worth of free campaign coverage for Hillary Clinton.  This has actually been the case with the media essentially campaigning for the democrat for about the past half century.

However, they’re getting sloppy.  In their overt hatred of republicans and shrill and often nonsensical support for democrats, most Americans are now viewing everything they say or report with a healthy measure of skepticism.   With Hillary, the media has a lot of balls to juggle and let’s face it, for the most part, most media personalities aren’t the brightest bulbs on the tree.

The Obama administration can take up some of the slack and lend a powerful helping hand.  We can assume that the IRS “investigation” into the Clinton Foundation will go nowhere, nor the same investigation being conducted by the FBI.   We can only hope that these schemes advanced against America as typified by the likes of this muslim radical Khan episode discussed above blow up in their faces and more and more Americans wake up to the extreme peril that our nation faces.

Ultimately, overcoming a significant democrat voter fraud issue, it will depend on who shows up to vote this fall.  Will it be enough to overcome fraud and overcome Hillary Clinton.  There are enough Americans to accomplish this and ultimately it will be observed that America will deserve exactly what it gets because it will get exactly what it has chosen.

Whether it will be that America the Great is fallen remains to be seen.  All great nations of the past are fallen and nothing but fading memories and America’s fall is inevitable.  The question is, does it have to happen now or can we delay it.  In about 100 days, we will find out.

Donald Trump is a Racist

Yes, it appears that the mask is off and the truth of rampant republican racism has been revealed.  What so many millions of Americans have known for generations has become undeniable with the blatant assault on minorities in the country by that party’s front runner.  It is apparent that Trump is just not seasoned enough as a republican politician to mask his racism, he has failed to master the use of code words and phrases that most republican politicians have perfected to a fine art.  We witness the nation rising up in anger as his vocal barbs cut Americans who are “different” to the quick and his thuggish followers physically assault those brave enough to speak out, while they peaceably attend his “rallies”, against his outrageous outbursts.

Salmaan Khan, a Ph.D. student in political science at York University, writer for “Counterpunch” on February 22, sums up Donald Trump and his message quite well, writing –

“Make America Great Again”: the official motto of the Trump campaign. Alluding back to the bygone days where America was actually once great. Where or when this was, is never specified, though perhaps it was at the initial moment of colonization and the genocide of indigenous peoples; or on the blood soaked slave plantations; or the imperialist wars; or Jim Crow; or more imperialist wars; or the rich textiled history of racism where white people had all of the power instead of most of it.

Make America Great Again, to a time when its land and liberty, its culture and sensibility was not saturated with the multiplicities of little people that now sully its shores. Make America Great Again, to a time when the great white majority was able to secure itself from the onslaught of Mongol hordes and when the Commander in Chief came from a well-bred family, raised in the cattle fields of the South – nurtured within the ivory halls of the most ideologically complicit institutions. Yes, Make America Great Again, for it is a nation and people now tainted, in need of an exorcism – of a purging.”

Or so the liberal propaganda goes…

As we’ve discussed before here on this site, the liberal plot to destroy America is to divide it into its various ethnic, religious, immoral and racial groups.  First and foremost, the prime play in their playbook is to portray the Republican Party as the party of white racists.  Culturally, it’s just about all that the liberals have left and they intend to milk this all the way to the finish line.

It is of critical importance that normal traditional Americans of all colors and stripes understand the psychological war that is being waged against them in America.  To the liberals there are two main targets, the youth and then the adults and they treat each group much differently.  They understand they actually can create liberals in the youth camp by a number of mind manipulation techniques.

The assault on adults is more along the lines of containment or marginalization through fear and intimidation.  Traditionalists are hamstrung in their thinking by not seeing this big picture, by thinking that liberals and conservatives are similar Americans who want basically the same things, they just have different methods of reaching the same destination.

The truth is that liberals have had a century of learning, planning and executing, step by step, their conquest of America and the Western World in total, for that matter.  We have confused their deliberate plan for our conquest with the notion that they merely, out of the kindness of their hearts, want to improve the lots of our citizens who find themselves in less than optimal conditions.

Liberals have always fostered the notion that they have a heart and conservatives are heartless.  Liberals care, conservatives don’t.  Liberals feel your pain, conservatives could care less.  Liberals are inclusive, conservatives are racists.  Liberals desire to liberate you from any constraints, conservatives insist that we adhere to ancient principles that have no place in this modern enlightened age.

The question we have to ask ourselves is this, have we been the target of a concerted effort by those bent on the destruction of America as we’ve known it?  Can we say that the democrat party has been long conquered by those who our constitution refers to as “domestic enemies”?  Until you can comfortably say yes to these two questions, then you’re still in the dark.  You are still under a certain measure of mind control and manipulation by these enemies.

Obviously, critical to their success, the enemy must conceal his methods of conquest, they must keep as many Americans in “the dark” as possible.  The more Americans who awaken to the danger is just one more who is capable of joining in the resistance to the enemy.

Let’s define the three words of the title of this piece.

Discernment – Noun – “the faculty of discerning; discrimination; acuteness of judgment and understanding; the act or an instance of discerning.”  Since discernment is the “faculty of discerning or an act of discerning, then we need to look up its definition.

Discern – Verb – (used with object) (1) to perceive by the sight or some other sense or by the intellect; see, recognize, or apprehend:  They discerned a sail on the horizon.

(2)  to distinguish mentally; recognize as distinct or different, to see or understand the difference; discriminate: He is incapable of discerning right from wrong.

Discern – Verb – (used without object) (3)  to distinguish or discriminate.

The origin of the word from Middle French meant to sift or separate.

We see that our second word, discrimination, is synonymous with discernment in some ways, but let’s look at its full definition anyway.

Discrimination:  (1) the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex

(2)  recognition and understanding of the difference between one thing and another:  discrimination between right and wrong.

From Latin to distinguish between.

Wisdom:  the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment; the quality of being wise.

Wise:  (1)  characterized by wisdom :  marked by deep understanding, keen discernment, and a capacity for sound judgment.  The old Norse and Old English origin of the word meant “to know the way”.

(2)  exercising or showing sound judgment :  prudent (having or showing good judgment).

We now live in an age of relativism where the true meanings of the words above are either lost, banned or corrupted.  After the civil war, the first meaning we see listed above for “discrimination” to mean an unjust or prejudicial treatment, came into being for a definition of the word.  While it is one of the liberals’ favorite words to assault conservatives with, its original and correct meaning simply means to make a distinction between two different things.  When was the last time you’ve heard the words discernment or wisdom?

In the liberal west any distinctions, any discernment is attacked as wrong because to liberals there are no absolute values, all things are relative.  In liberal land we cannot make distinctions.  Why we ask?  The answer is simple, the liberals intend to crush traditional American culture.  It is the tree they are chopping down.  Nothing that is traditionally “American” can be advanced as good, advantageous, superior or better.

Let’s consider the basic tenants of American Conservatism.

Wikipedia gives an opening definition that just about sums it up, at least for me anyway.

“Historically, the central themes in American conservatism have included respect for American traditions, support of republicanism and the rule of law, Judeo-Christian values, anti-Communism, advocacy of American exceptionalism and a defense of Western civilization from perceived threats posed by moral relativism, multiculturalism, and postmodern ridicule of traditional culture. Liberty is a core value, with a particular emphasis on strengthening the free market, and opposition to high taxes and government or labor union encroachment on the entrepreneur.”

The wiki article goes on to quote William F. Buckley who at one time was just about the only conservative voice in America with national reach.  In the first issue of his magazine, “National Review” in 1955 he defined his conservative movement as-

“Among our convictions:

“It is the job of centralized government (in peacetime) to protect its citizens’ lives, liberty and property. All other activities of government tend to diminish freedom and hamper progress. The growth of government (the dominant social feature of this century) must be fought relentlessly. In this great social conflict of the era, we are, without reservations, on the libertarian side.

“The profound crisis of our era is, in essence, the conflict between the Social Engineers, who seek to adjust mankind to conform with scientific utopias, and the disciples of Truth, who defend the organic moral order. We believe that truth is neither arrived at nor illuminated by monitoring election results, binding though these are for other purposes, but by other means, including a study of human experience. On this point we are, without reservations, on the conservative side.”

So, what defines American conservatism?

1)  Respect for American traditions.

This point needs little discussion.  If you are a conservative you value our history, you recognize and appreciate the evolution of thinking that was only possible in a nation like ours.  America had the capacity for self-correction, Republicans ended slavery and then the jim crow laws a half century ago.  Americans over time made their actions match more and more the stated philosophies and standards of our founding documents.  No nation in the history of the world has ever equaled America as a land of freedom and opportunity.  One conservative motto may be “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”.

2)  Support for our constitutional government as created and intended by our founders.

True conservatives, as opposed to simply “republicans” work to diminish the size of our government as it has exploded into a monster that is consuming our nation.  As Reagan said, “government is not the solution, it is the problem”.  Liberals, of course believe that government, or The State can provide the answer for all of our problems.  Our founders never intended for the federal government to mutate into what it is today.

We do not have a constitutional government.  The federal government now intrudes into virtually every aspect of our lives, a far cry from the 18 enumerated powers the framers of the constitution granted to the central government with all over powers reserved for the state.  There is an inverse correlation at work here, the more government, the less liberty.

3)  The rule of law, every citizen should be treated equally under it and that all law should have the consent of the governed.

We witness the abuse of the law continually with the rich, famous, favored minorities and connected democrats flaunting the law with impunity.  Law should also have the consent of the governed.  Our founders intend America to be “a nation of Laws”, a nation under the rule of law as opposed to rule by monarchies as was common in Europe at the time.

The American colonies had revolted against the Crown and thus put into place what was intended to create a level playing field for all citizens as far as law and legal rights were concerned as opposed to the “rule of men” which would inevitably result in arbitrary, unforeseen or unknowable government actions against the individual.  The “rule of law” must therefore result in predictable outcomes and they must be laws overwhelmingly supported by the people, the consent or agreement of the governed.

This brings us to Natural Law.

Our founders applied the concepts of “Natural Law” in formulating the U.S. Constitution and what it was intended to accomplish.  Obama was correct in saying that the Constitution, especially the first ten Amendments, was one of “negative” rights.  Naturally, obama is critical of these negative rights simply because our constitution proclaims what our government cannot do.  Liberals believe in positive rights granted by the government, that the government should provide a chicken in every pot, cradle to grave welfare, free healthcare, etc.

Fortunately, our founders understood the sure disaster that would ensue had our rights sprung from government, so they fashioned a government that did not guarantee rights, but protected god given or natural rights that man should have already.  Our constitution was intended to restrain government not unleash it as we see today.   With regard to law, our founders and the first several generations of lawyers were trained by the writings of the great English Jurist Sir William Blackstone who had written-

“For as God, when he created matter, and endued it with a principle of mobility, established certain rules for the…direction of that motion; so, when he created man, and endued him with freewill to conduct himself in all parts of life, he laid down certain immutable laws of human nature, whereby that freewill is in some degree regulated and restrained, and gave him also the faculty of reason to discover the purport of (or meaning of) those laws.”

Thomas Jefferson had echoed those sentiments by saying-

“Man has been subjected by his Creator to the moral law, of which his feelings, or conscience as it is sometimes called, are the evidence with which his Creator has furnished him …. The moral duties which exist between individual and individual in a state of nature, accompany them into a state of society… their Maker not having released them from those duties on their forming themselves into a nation.”

So what is Natural Law?

From the legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com we see this definition

“The unwritten body of universal moral principles that underlie the ethical and legal norms by which human conduct is sometimes evaluated and governed. Natural law is often contrasted with positive law, which consists of the written rules and regulations enacted by government. The term natural law is derived from the Roman term jus naturale. Adherents to natural law philosophy are known as naturalists.”

There are three basic schools of Natural Law – Divine, Secular and Historical.  Clearly our founders were influenced primarily by Divine Natural Law, although at that time, there were no great conflicts between the three and in fact, all three were operative.  A brief definition of these three are as follows.

Divine – In a protestant Christian environment that characterized our nation nearly two and half centuries ago, this could be summed up as crimes and liberties as defined in the Bible.  Up until very recently, our lifetimes, if something was prohibited in the scriptures, other than dietary and other special restrictions God placed on Israel as a nation, it was illegal or certainly unethical.  Our liberties also came from the scriptures – a free market economy, rights of property and self- defense.  If the bible was against something, America was against it, if the bible was for something, America was for it.

“Secular – The school of natural law known as secular natural law replaces the divine laws of God with the physical, biological, and behavioral laws of nature as understood by human reason. This school theorizes about the uniform and fixed rules of nature, particularly human nature, to identify moral and ethical norms. Influenced by the rational empiricism of the seventeenth-and eighteenth-century Enlightenment thinkers who stressed the importance of observation and experiment in arriving at reliable and demonstrable truths, secular natural law elevates the capacity of the human intellect over the spiritual authority of religion.” 

Our founders would not have “replaced the divine laws of God” with the laws of nature as understood by human reason simply because the new nation of the United States was thoroughly Christianized.  It has likely never been true that the majority of American citizens at any given time were Christians, but it was certainly true that the ethical environment, or the ethos, of America in 1787 was Christian in nature.  There was simply no serious competing view present at that time, the atheistic or deistic views of the European mainland just couldn’t make significant inroads into colonial American thinking as it did in France (and adopted by modern Western Liberals)

Rather than “Secular Natural Law” competing against Divine Natural Law it was perfectly complementary.  The moral standards at the time were buttressed by colleges such as Yale, Harvard and Princeton that were started so that

“youth may be instructed in the Arts and Sciences who through the blessing of God may be fitted for Public employment both in Church and Civil State” (Yale)

and “Let every student be plainly instructed, and earnestly pressed to consider well, the main end of his life and studies is, to know God and Jesus Christ which is eternal life, John 17:3, and therefore to lay Christ in the bottom, as the only foundation of all sound knowledge and learning…” (Harvard)

and “… our great Intention was to erect a seminary for educating Ministers of the Gospel”. (Princeton).

These colleges along with others were formed as a result of the Great Awakening, religious revivals that swept the colonies decades before the revolution that spiritually energized the colonies, spurring them on to missionary efforts among the Indians, these colleges to train pastors and they also served as a repository for the sentiment of independence from the Anglican Church and ultimately of independence from England itself.

The last form of Natural Law is Historical –

According to this school, law must be made to conform with the well-established, but unwritten, customs, traditions, and experiences that have evolved over the course of history. Historical natural law has played an integral role in the development of the Anglo-American system of justice. When King James I attempted to assert the absolute power of the British monarchy during the seventeenth century, for example, English jurist Sir Edward Coke argued that the sovereignty of the crown was limited by the ancient liberties of the English people, immemorial custom, and the rights prescribed by Magna Charta in 1215. 

Magna Charta also laid the cornerstone for many U.S. constitutional liberties. The Supreme Court has traced the origins of grand juries, petit juries, and the writ of Habeas Corpus to Magna Charta. The Eighth Amendment proportionality analysis, which requires that criminal sanctions bear some reasonable relationship to the seriousness of the offense, was foreshadowed by the Magna Charta prohibition of excessive fines. The concept of due process was inherited from the requirement in Magna Charta that all legal proceedings comport with the “law of the land”.  

Due Process of Law, the Supreme Court has observed, contains both procedural and historical aspects that tend to converge in criminal cases. Procedurally, due process guarantees criminal defendants a fair trial. Historically, due process guarantees that no defendant may be convicted of a crime unless the government can prove his or her guilt Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Although the reasonable doubt standard can be found nowhere in the express language of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has said that the demand for a higher degree of persuasion in criminal cases has been repeatedly expressed since “ancient times” through the common-law tradition and is now “embodied in the Constitution”. 

As with Secular Historical Law, the Historical also easily merged with the Divine at the start of our nation.  As the precepts of secular law were determined by reason, in other words men determined that some things were good and some bad based on deductive reasoning, but since the mindset of our founders was Christian in nature and form, they reasoned from a biblical perspective.  Likewise, up to that point and years beyond it was simply that the “customs, traditions, and experiences that have evolved over the course of history” of America was Christian.

Thus, in the founding era of our nation, all aspects of “Natural Law” were Christian in nature.

It’s the last phrase I just used that divides Americans at the moment.  Traditional conservative Americans are generally of one mind on what constitutes reasonable laws that are understood, equally applied and viewed as good for society as a whole.  Liberals, on the other hand, in their process of shattering the homogenous nature of our society push for laws that only their fringe groups approve of, the most notable, the homosexual “rights” laws.

The final values that define conservatism are-

4)  Judeo-Christian values.  Our nation was founded by Christians for Christians and it was these values that compelled our revolt against England.

5)  Anti-communistic.  Communism was the great enemy of our nation for many decades.  America fought a long hard cold war and some hot wars to stop its encroachment upon the world against nation enemies such as the Soviet Union, China and North Korea as well as our domestic enemies, the liberals, who have much more in common with commies than traditional Americans.

6)  Conservatives are proud of our country and see no need to “transform” it.  By nearly any standard, America is exceptional, not as Obama would proclaim just as any other nation considers itself exception, but truly exceptional and unique.

7)  Conservatives are opposed to forces attempting to destroy what America is and represents.  Conservatives, therefore, opposes moral relativism, multiculturalism, and postmodern ridicule of traditional culture.

8)  Conservatives do defend the free market, entrepreneurism against government intrusion and growth beyond constitutional boundaries.

America is becoming more and more lawless by the day.  Rebellion against God and tradition has run its course and has created the rotting corpse of America that we witness today.  Hillary Clinton is not popular because of what she says, but by what she does.  She is a criminal candidate for a criminal class of humans that infest our country.

As others have noted and several other articles on this site discuss, the democrat party is a coalition party of aggrieved fools who are united by hatred of traditional America.

Just over the past few days, black thugs cheered on by the democrat party including Obama and Hillary have escalated the war against “whitey”, actually against “white culture” made up of all races, as they’ve taken to murdering police officers.

To the racists (liberals/democrats and their minority plantation members) “blue” is part of the white establishment, as we know “law and order” are code words for racism. Obviously its racist to expect feral blacks to act appropriately in our society.

Notice over the past few years that black thugs are becoming more and more brazen, largely because they get away with it and the democrat party is cheering them on. Years ago, the violence was largely contained in the black ghetto strongholds, you just simply didn’t take any “wrong turns” to end up there. Next, over the past decade we began seeing the assaults of the “youth” gangs just inundating stores, laughing in the camera as they stripped it nearly bare.

Then we started witnessing the “knock out games”, the “polar bear hunts”, as the thugs began attacking whites and Asians. Then we began witnessing the assaults at various state fairs, where the violent thugs would just assault the throngs of people with near complete impunity.

Then we witnessed the thugs burning down their communities and going on looting sprees while authorities watched and video taped, once again with total immunity, in fact, encouraged by the local and state democrat leaders.

What’s a good thug to do? They’re getting away with everything, why not ramp it up, why not start a shooting war with authorities, with the white establishment.  Heck, the president and the AG praise them, coddle them, defend them, show up at the funerals of their fallen comrades.  Hillary, their girl has embraced them.

Thugs are like animals in the respect that they only respond to pain and pleasure.  Their sensory input tells them that there is no pain or consequences for any of their actions so far, therefore they will continue the pleasure of taking whitey out.  They will continue until it becomes painful.

They know the democrat plantation masters are far more interested in disarming the law abiding than correcting their actions.  In fact, the not so subliminal message is “keep it up, we have an agenda that requires your increased violence, be our good foot soldiers”.

It is sort of humorous in a way watching the likes of Obama, Hillary, Lynch, the BTM (black thugs matter) bunch moon-walking backwards attempting to distance themselves from all this after doing nothing but incite this escalating violence against whitey. Naturally, the press will allow them to get away with it. All these murderous thugs are doing was “bring a gun…”.